The New Zealand Model for Psychological Assessment for Cross-Cultural Mission

Abstract

The Australasian Mission Assessment Project (AMAP) examined the psychological assessment of cross-cultural mission candidates across Australia and New Zealand and found practice in these two countries differed considerably. This research aimed to investigate the New Zealand Model in greater detail using a qualitative case study approach. The Assessment Coordinator, professional assessors who clinically interviewed candidates, and mission organisation staff who received written reports, were interviewed in order to document and describe the history, process and experience of this unique way of standardising assessments. The New Zealand Model represents a streamlined process, within one country, which is consistent, and centrally coordinated and disseminated. Assessors valued this team approach and wanted organisations to value and utilise the reports rather than seeing them as a necessary hurdle. Mission organisations in New Zealand described the reports as understandable and consistent. They suggested a summary paragraph or page with key recommendations could be helpful. They contained valuable recommendations to guide discernment for ministry, and feedback which fostered personal awareness and gr­owth in candidates. The case study of the New Zealand Model provides a template and important insights that could assist other countries to work towards a more consistent and coordinated approach that is optimal for assessors and organisations.